Valuable Opinions, Comments & Gossip
Latest News, Stories
& Hot Topics
Tools & Widgets to
help with finances
Featured Polls, Surveys & Stats
Discussions, Advice & Topical Chat
- Business
- Childbirth & Education
- Legal Formalities
- Motoring
- Other
- Pensions & Benefits
- Property & Accommodation
- Taxes
- Airports and Airlines Spain
- Paramount Theme Park Murcia Spain
- Corvera International Airport Murcia Spain
- Join us for Tea on the Terrace
- When Expat Eyes Are Smiling
- Meet Wincham at The Homes, Gardens & Lifestyle Show, Calpe
- QROPS 2014
- Spain Increases IHT in Valencia & Murcia
- Removals to Spain v Exports from Spain
- The Charm of Seville
- Gibraltar Relations
- Retiro Park : Madrid
- Community Insurance in Spain
- Calendar Girls
- Considerations when Insuring your Boat in Spain
- QROPS – HMRC Introduces changes that create havoc in the market place
- QROPS – All Change From April 2012
- Liva & Laia : 15th November
The clock is ticking once again for Murcia's Paramount Pictures theme park project.
The promotor and developer of the park, Proyectos Emblemáticos Murcianos SA (Premursa) headed by President Jesus Samper, was due to officially sign for the purchase of the 1,812,926 meters square plot of land at Alhama de Murcia where the theme park and lifestyle centre was scheduled to be built on the 6th of February.
Question : Why was this only brought to light at the very last moment when the purchase was moved to the notary ? - Outstanding debts attached to Spanish property can easily be checked out way in advance.
Samper acknowledged the 'slight problem', stating how it would not have an effect on the laying of the first stone at the park being scheduled for April this year, and with the park being officially open for business for the summer of 2015.
Samper also stated at the time that the purchase would be brought back to the notary again once the problem had been rectified in 1 month's time.
Question : One month on from the 6th of February is the 6th of March, and everything seems to have gone quiet once again. Is this a sign that the issue has not yet been resolved, or that a further 'problem' has presented itself ?
